Friday, February 27, 2009
Some people don't know how math works
I admit that for convenience sake this is acceptable, but at least acknowledge it.
Thursday, February 26, 2009
Tecate with Lime
2. Pour lime juice on top of the can
3. Drink beer with lime juice
4. Enjoy
5. Repeat
*One can also add salt. I believe sea salt is the best
Wednesday, February 25, 2009
Tuesday, February 24, 2009
baseball's top 100 prospects
http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/prospects/rankings/top-100-prospects/2009/267698.html
I was upset that after number 3 colby rasmus, we only gotz like number 50 and 93 or something. It would be nice to have 1-10.
Monday, February 23, 2009
Baseball Panda Analogy (WIP)
The Kung Fu Panther will be played by Barry Bonds. I think he fits the bill perfectly for he was born to baseball greats and has strived his entire life to become the best baseball player of all time, to the detriment of his health, his friends and his family.
Now imagine a few years back when BB was still playing ball for the Giants. Now imagine that everyone knows BB is going to win the world series for the giants if someone doesn't stop him.
Now imagine fat little Jeremy, as a fourteen year old with stretch marks (ahem, racing stripes). He lays around all night never practicing his throwing, his batting, or his fielding. He just imagines being Albert Pujols.
Then, one day his mother sends him on a field trip with her class of students to see the Cardinals play at New Cardinal Stadium. Now Jeremy can't get to the good seats so he abandons the kids and launches some fireworks that he never gets in trouble for, instead Tony Larussa decides to make Jeremy Steinberg the starting pitcher, much to the dismay of Dave Duncan.
So Dave Duncan is being an asshole to Jeremy, but he is so excited that he takes the abuse. They start training, and finally Dave Duncan starts to believe in Steinberg. Later that year the New Cardinals make the playoffs.
In game three of the world series they put Jeremy Steinberg on the mound. The bases are loaded and its the bottom of the ninth, Giants 3 New Cardinals 2. Jeremy Steinberg then starts to believe in himself and strikes out Barry Bonds, due to his giant fat stomach which he utilizes for his pitches. Then Jeremy Steinberg wins the game with a home run, also due to the fact that he doesn't play baseball he just sat around and ate sammiches.
As it turns out learning and practicing baseball have nothing to do with being a good baseball player, you just have to happen to be a certain kind of uselessly fat and have good intentions.
Man, that would make a good movie.
Friday, February 20, 2009
Analysis of the Significance of Statistical Categories in Fantasy Baseball: How to choose the right scoring categories
Sawyer Campbell
Commissioner, Toddy Hollandsworths Fantasy Baseball League
2009 Season
Abstract
This is meant to inform why we will be using a particular set of statistics to evaluate the scoring of points in our league. A simple combination of mathematical analysis and the concepts of fairness are coupled with the American concept of freedom to determine what categories we should choose to have a fair and balanced league, but with enough room for an individual owner to customize their team according to their liking.
Importance of Proper Statistics Categories
First, I want to establish that we cannot simply use the trendiest stats to base our scoring upon because they have limited intrinsic value. We also cannot use esoteric stats like complete games or hit batsmen because of their statistical insignificance in a head to head league. The proper choice of categories must be balanced to prevent owners from too easily abusing the system. If we recall last year, we had owners who won several categories because they tallied the lowest numbers in those categories, but it was a result of not updating their team. We will no longer reward negligence. An owner also could theoretically have a complete imbalance between their pitching and hitting performance on their team and if there were an uneven number of categories for pitching and hitting, then an owner could would a majority of categories by having a one dimensional team. With a proper choice of stat categories, one can force an owner to have a balanced lineup, but one could still win with an unbalanced lineup; the owner is left with the freedom to choose how to construct their team. This will depend on how the roster is established and will be discussed later.
In a head to head matchup, it is important to have statistically significant categories to judge a team against another. One also wishes to have the same number of categories under pitching as one has under hitting to promote a balanced team. To do this, one must understand that there are two kinds of stats. From here on out, we will call offensive stats like Runs and Hits and pitching stats like Wins and Ks “Sum” stats. A Sum stat is a stat which is a positive whole number which cannot decrease by a player’s poor play, but is rather a totaling of the player’s contribution to the team. We also call these progressive statistics. If a player does not contribute to a team, then there is no negative impact on Sum stats; the impact can only be neutral or positive. The problem with Sum stats is that they inherently promote quantity over quality. An owner could abuse sum stats by playing more batters off the bench and thus increasing their chance of winning the Sum stat categories. To balance these progressive Sum stats one could introduce regressive Sum stats such as Errors or Losses, but these could ultimately lead to an owner winning by neglecting to play a full team which has happened in the past. The correct choice to balance these progressive Sum stats is to include stats that from here on out we will call “Percent” stats.
Percent stats include ERA, OBP, AVG, and WHIP and all are extremely valuable measures of a player’s ability. These Percent stats are different than the monotonic Sums stats (contribution can only be neutral or positive) in that a player’s contribution can be negative, neutral, or positive. The impact of the negative contribution of Percent stats forces the owner to choose quality over quantity. But again, one could only play one amazing player and possibly win the Percent stats so they must be equaled in number by Sum stats to force the owner to field a full team. The end result of a combination of these stats is that an owner is almost forced to yield a full team of quality players that is balanced across the board.
Our Statistics Categories
The categories chosen for our league break down as follows:
Batting / Defense | |
Sum Stats | Percent Stats |
Hits (H) | Batting Average (AVG) |
Runs (RBI) | On Base Percentage (OBP) |
Runs (R) | Slugging Percentage (SLG) |
Stolen Bases (SB) | Fielding Percentage (FPCT) |
Pitching | |
Sum Stats | Percent Stats |
Wins (W) | Earned Run Average (ERA) |
Quality Starts (QS) | Walks Plus Hits Per Inning Pitched (WHIP) |
Strikeouts (K) | Win Percentage (WPCT) |
Saves Plus Holds (SVHD) | Save Percentage (SVPCT) |
Hitting Categories
One might ask why these particular categories were chosen. Let us break this down first by Batting/Defense categories and then by Pitching Categories. The typical stats of H, R, RBI, and SB are all present to measure an individual player’s contribution to the offense. Other statistics such as Runs Created were looked at, but due to the varying definitions of such stats they were overlooked for now. Last year, we had no way of valuing one type of hit from another and we sought to prevent this from happening this season. One way to do this would be to include the ever popular Home Runs (HR) category, but this does not value a double or a triple over a single and over emphasizes the contributions that a HR gives.
Home Run Stat Analysis
Hitting a Homerun = 1H + 1RBI + 1R +1HR + AVG (All increase)
Hitting any other hit =1H + AVG (only RBIs are possible to add)
HR = 5 categories guaranteed
Any other hit = 2 categories guaranteed, 3 possible
One can see that Home Runs are simply overweighed against other types of hits. To prevent this, we have included the concept of Slugging Percentage (SLG) which is defined as
and takes into account other types of hits by weighting them by the number of bases a batter earns with each hit. What this stat tells us is the average number of bases a player will achieve per at-bat. A SLG of 1.000 equates to a player earning, on average, a base for every at-bat. Another important category is On Base Percentage (OBP) ,which is defined as
OBP indicates the average that a player gets on base for a single plate appearance. An OBP of 1.000 would predict a player getting a base every time they stepped up to the plate. Fielding Percentage (FPCT) has been included and Errors (E) have been left out because Errors are a regressive stat category.
Pitching Categories
Pitching categories are a little bit harder to deal with on a statistical significance level if they are broken down into the individual contributions by the pitchers of specified roles. We have chosen to have eight scoring categories for pitchers which include; W, QS, K, SVHD, WPCT, SVPCT, WHIP, ERA. These categories were chosen in the same methodology as the hitting categories which eliminates regressive stat categories and creates an equal number of Sum categories and Percentage categories that enforce quantity and quality, respectively. Whereas a batter can contribute to all eight offensive and defensive categories, no single pitcher can contribute to all eight pitching categories during one appearance. This breaks down as follows:
Starting Pitcher | |
Possible Scoring Categories | Not Possible Scoring Categories |
W, K, QS, W%, ERA, WHIP | SVHD, SVPCT |
Relief Pitcher | |
Possible Scoring Categories | Not Possible Scoring Categories |
W, K, SVHD, SVPCT, W%, ERA, WHIP | QS |
One can see that a relief pitcher can impact 7/8 or 87.5% of possible stat categories, whereas a starting pitcher can impact 6/8 or 75% of possible stat categories. This imbalance creates a situation in which an owner would very likely need to have a team which consisted of both starting pitchers and relievers and one kind of pitcher. Regressive categories such as Runs Allowed, Earned Runs, and Losses are gone for reasons stated above. The pitching category is much better balanced than last year’s. Take for example the possible impact of a start on the stats
Last Year
A Win = 1W + WPCT
No Decision = no impact
A Loss = 1L -WPCT
This Year
A Win = 1W + WPCT, QS is possible
No Decision = 0W + 0WPCT, Qs is possible
A Loss = 0W -WPCT, Qs is possible
First, let’s discard stats such as ERA, WHIP, and K which both year’s scoring categories possessed. If we look at the possible contributions by number of categories, then last year a win had an impact of two categories, a no decision had an impact of zero categories, and a loss had an impact of negative two categories. This year, a win can have an impact of one or two categories, a no decision can have an impact of zero or one category, and a loss can have an impact of negative one or zero categories. The result of the scoring this year is that a single decision is just as important as how well the pitcher pitched. It is possible for a loss not to impact a player’s scoring.
Summary
We have evaluated the impact of possible scoring categories and have determined sixteen total categories to use for scoring. We have also established a balanced between pitching and hitting categories and also balances within the pitching and hitting categories by removing regressive Sum stats and having an equal number of progressive Sum Stats and Percentage stats. Further analysis of the chosen scoring categories shows that the overall scoring should be better balanced than the scoring system in last year’s league.
Appendix A: Further analysis of impact of extra players
There are several places on the bench for extra players and every owner can do as they please with these players. If they choose to play these players when a regular starter has no game on that day, then there is a possible measurable impact of playing the bench player in that open spot. The following is an analysis based on categories only. The degree of impact will change with a player’s actual play during a game, but during a week’s time fluctuations will begin to average out.
Extra Batter | |
Possible Impact | Not Possible Impact |
H, R, RBI, SB, AVG, SLG, OBP, FPCT | N/A |
An extra batter can impact 100% of possible categories, but should one play an extra batter? Further analysis shows that Sum stats cannot have a negative impact and that Percentage stats can have either a positive or negative impact. Since there are four Sum categories and four Percentage categories, then an extra batter’s contribution can be expressed as
CXB = 4 +/- 4
And therefore, the range of impact of an extra batter can be expressed as
0<= IXB =<>
Starting Pitcher | |
Possible Scoring Categories | Not Possible Scoring Categories |
W, K, QS, W%, ERA, WHIP | SVHD, SVPCT |
An extra starting pitcher can only impact 75% of possible categories. Using similar analysis we can see that an extra starting pitcher’s contribution can be expressed as
CXSP = 3 +/- 3
And therefore, the range of impact of an extra starting pitcher can be expressed as
0<= IXSP =<>
Relief Pitcher | |
Possible Scoring Categories | Not Possible Scoring Categories |
W, K, SVHD, SVPCT, W%, ERA, WHIP | QS |
An extra relief pitcher can only impact 87.5% of possible categories which is more than an extra starting pitcher can impact. Using similar analysis we can see that an extra relief pitcher’s contribution can be expressed as
CXRP = 3 +/- 4
And therefore, the range of impact of an extra starting pitcher can be expressed as
-1<= IXRP =<>
What is interesting to note is that it could be quite dangerous to play an extra reliever over an extra starting pitcher, but one has to take into account the limited quantity of quality starting pitchers available and then couple that with differences inherent in pitching situations between relief pitchers and starting pitchers.
Conclusion
The impact of an extra player can be measured in a categorical sense by analysis of the possible impact that the extra player could have on the scoring categories available to them. Ultimately, the decision to have extra batters, starting pitchers, or relief pitchers will depend on the available talent and the owner’s individual needs and their willingness to take risks.
Thursday, February 19, 2009
Once you get rid of your virus
http://connect-a-desk.com/
They are awesome.
Wednesday, February 18, 2009
Tuesday, February 17, 2009
Microsoft to Open Retail Stores?
1. What is Fair Use?
In essence, fair use is a limitation on the exclusive rights of copyright holders. The Copyright Act gives copyright holders the exclusive right to reproduce works for a limited time period. Fair use is a limitation on this right. A use which is considered "fair" does not infringe copyright, even if it involves one of the exclusive rights of copyright holders. Fair use allows consumers to make a copy of part or all of a copyrighted work, even where the copyright holder has not given permission or objects to your use of the work.
3. How Do You Know If It's Fair Use?
There are no clear-cut rules for deciding what's fair use and there are no "automatic" classes of fair uses. Fair use is decided by a judge, on a case by case basis, after balancing the four factors listed in section 107 of the Copyright statute. The factors to be considered include:
- The purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes -- Courts are more likely to find fair use where the use is for noncommercial purposes.
- The nature of the copyrighted work -- A particular use is more likely to be fair where the copied work is factual rather than creative.
- The amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole -- A court will balance this factor toward a finding of fair use where the amount taken is small or insignificant in proportion to the overall work.
- The effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work -- If the court finds the newly created work is not a substitute product for the copyrighted work, it will be more likely to weigh this factor in favor of fair use.
Courts have previously found that a use was fair where the use of the copyrighted work was socially beneficial. In particular, U.S. courts have recognized the following fair uses: criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, research and parodies.
Monday, February 16, 2009
Microsoft ovrehauls Windows Mobile OS
By NICK WINGFIELD and KATHY SANDLER
Microsoft Corp. said a new version of its operating system for mobile phones will be available on handsets by the end of the year as part of a plan by the company to strengthen its offerings in the consumer market.
The new operating system from the Redmond, Wash., company, called Windows Mobile 6.5, is designed to incorporate enhancements that have started to become common on sophisticated "smartphones," like better Web browsing and the ability to operated phones with touch-sensitive screens using a single thumb. Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer announced the new products in a keynote speech at a mobile industry conference in Barcelona, Spain, on Monday.
The improvements are important for Microsoft to stay competitive in a category that has experienced a major influx of investment and innovation in the past two years from rivals like Apple Inc. and Google Inc. Microsoft executives concede the company has focused too much in recent years on the business market for mobile phones, while neglecting features that have started to catch on with users through products like Apple's iPhone.
For instance, Microsoft will create an online service, called Windows Marketplace for Mobile, that will let mobile users wirelessly download software from independent developers directly to their handsets. A similar service from Apple, the App Store, has become a popular method for iPhone users to download everything from games to social networking software onto their phones.
"It's a highly competitive market, because what happens in the next three years is going to define what the industry looks like in the next 10 years," Andrew Lees, senior vice president of Microsoft's mobile communications business, said in an interview.
The overhaul includes a redesign of the Windows Mobile home screen into a "honeycomb" layout with big icons instead of the more traditional look that borrows from its Windows desktop ancestry. The company has widened menus so that users on touch-sensing phone models can navigate them with their fingers, rather than requiring a stylus.
Handsets makers say they remain committed to using Windows Mobile on their devices. Korea's LG Electronics, the world's third largest handset maker, agreed to make Windows Mobile the primary operating system for its mobile phones, increasing by tenfold the number of Windows-based devices it expects to distribute this year.
Handset maker HTC Corp., introduced two new products on Monday, the HTC Touch Diamond 2 and Touch Pro 2, that will come with an older version of Microsoft's mobile operating system but will be upgradable to the new version when it comes out. John Wang, the chief marketing officer of HTC, said the company's commitment to use Microsoft's software on its phones is "absolute and unwavering," even though HTC has begun to make devices that use Google's Android mobile operating system.
-from The Wall Street Journal